| Dear Sirs:
We are writing to express our support for efforts to address the
FSC/ETI issue in a manner that boosts U.S. international competitiveness
while also avoiding the imposition of an effective tax increase
on businesses currently benefiting from FSC/ETI.
The Silicon Valley Tax Directors Group (SVTDG) supports efforts
to enact international tax simplification provisions as part of
any FSC/ETI replacement bill. We would encourage efforts to address
important areas such as: repeal of the subpart F trading provisions;
allocation of interest expense on a worldwide basis; reduction of
foreign tax credit baskets; extension of the foreign tax credit
carryforward period; and repeal of the alternative minimum tax foreign
tax credit limitation. These provisions would lower the current
U.S. tax on foreign earnings from the sale of goods and services
outside the United States.
At the same time, we are concerned that a repeal of the exclusion
for extraterritorial income (ETI) would increase the U.S. corporate
tax rate for U.S. manufacturers. Taxpayers that benefit from the
ETI exclusion are companies that manufacture or develop products
in the United States and export their products overseas. For many
U.S. manufacturers, the geographic location of research and development
also corresponds with the location of manufacturing. An increased
tax rate for U.S. manufacturers reduces their competitiveness, and
could cause multinationals that currently manufacture in the United
States to migrate activities to offshore locations. Although ETI
is no longer sustainable following the WTO decisions, the underlying
purpose of ETI remains – the maintenance of at least some
level of U.S. competitive balance of tax policy relative to our
foreign competitors.
For this reason, we would encourage consideration of specific provisions
providing a reduced rate of tax on manufacturing in the United States.
In addition, we would urge that Congress ensure that transition
provisions are provided to ease the pain from ETI repeal. In overturning
three decades of established U.S. tax policy, appropriate transition
mechanisms are in order.
In addition, we believe extension and enhancement of the research
credit is an essential component of any legislation intended to
ensure U.S. international competitiveness. While we strongly support
the permanent extension of the research credit, we welcome the inclusion
of a temporary credit extension proposal in the bill introduced
July 25 by Chairman Thomas, and support in particular the proposal
to provide a new simplified credit alternative.
Finally, we believe that any international tax legislation should
include language incorporating the provisions of legislation introduced
by Rep. Phil English (R-Pa) and Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev). The “Homeland
Investment Act” (H.R. 767) and the “Invest in the USA
Act” (S. 596) effectively would allow companies, for a one-year
period, to bring cash back to the U.S. subject to a 5.25 percent
toll tax on dividends in excess of normal distributions from foreign
subsidiaries.
The SVTDG believes international tax reform goals can be reconciled
with other tax policy viewpoints. Reconciliation within Congress,
and the U.S. high-tech multinational community, is possible if international
tax legislation is founded on the following:
- Reduced rate of tax on U.S. manufacturing profits;
- Subpart F repeal for trading income and foreign tax credit simplification
measures;
- R&D credit extension and enhancements; and
- Enactment of the "Homeland Investment" provisions
to encourage investment of foreign earnings in the United States.
We appreciate your consideration of these issues, and look forward
to supporting your efforts to pass international tax legislation
that promotes U.S. competitiveness.
|