| Dear Chairman Thomas and Chairman Grassley:
The Silicon Valley Tax Directors Group wants to express our strong
concerns over the proposal to require the signing of corporate tax
returns by the Chief Executive Officer.
This proposal was included in The CARE Act of 2003 (S. 476), passed
by the Senate this year. Another version was passed by the Senate
as part of S. 1054, but was deleted from the final “Jobs and
Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act.” The ETI repeal bill
(S. 1637), as introduced by Chairman Grassley, did not include a
CEO tax return signature provision, but has since been proposed
as part of a number of revenue offsets to be considered as part
of a Senate ETI repeal bill.
The SVTDG does not believe that this provision will result in any
improvement in the quality of corporate tax return filings. The
SVTDG shares the concern, expressed by other practitioners, as to
the practicalities of shifting tax return signing responsibility
to the CEO, and the proposal’s impact on a CEO’s focus
on the process of ensuring the complete and proper reporting of
its tax obligations. At a minimum, a CEO should only need to sign
a statement attesting to the fact that internal controls, including
personnel, are in place to give reasonable assurance that the tax
return is prepared in compliance with U.S. tax.
For that reason, we ask that the proposal to require CEOs to sign
the company’s tax return not be added to these bills or any
other tax legislation to be considered by Congress.
Respectfully,
The Silicon Valley Tax Directors Group |